I believe her original ending is much more fitting and in accordance with Poirot's character description. Aside from the fact that numerous details of the case were omitted presumably because of time limitations, Poirot's character was perverted with the added religious characteristics (catholic, praying type, etc.) which is not part of the book and the description of character in any of the Christie books. However, we're talking about a long book that requires time for digestion of details, development, and also to avoid monotonousness in the rhythm of the movie. I was amazed at how perfectly the actors were casted, so they perfectly fitted Christie's description of them in the book.
As an avid Agatha Christie reader, and a long time fan of David Suchet I was awaiting the release of this episode of Poirot for over a year.
0 kommentar(er)
